Myths and facts about video audiences
Article 6 of 6 in series: The Great Reach Reset
The media industry has always been shaped by strong narratives. At the moment, one of the most widely repeated narratives is that television is steadily losing relevance in an increasingly digital media landscape.
Advertising budgets are spreading across more channels than ever before, and the rapid growth of streaming platforms, online video, and social media has reinforced the perception that traditional video environments are gradually fading into the background.
It is an understandable narrative, but perceptions are not facts.
“In a fragmented media landscape, the biggest risk isn’t that audiences are disappearing – it’s that we stop seeing them clearly”, said Bruno Furnari, CPTO at AudienceProject, during his recent presentation at egta’s Market Intelligence Meeting in Zurich.
At AudienceProject, our role as an independent cross-media measurement company is not to follow industry narratives, but to measure what is actually happening across platforms. When we analyse thousands of campaigns and billions of impressions across markets, the data often tells a much more nuanced – and sometimes surprising – story. In fact, many of the assumptions that increasingly shape how media strategies are planned today simply do not hold up when confronted with real measurement.
Myth 1: Television is only for older audiences
One of the most persistent beliefs in the media industry is that younger audiences have largely abandoned television.
If one only looks at traditional linear television, this assumption may seem reasonable. Younger viewers do spend less time in front of scheduled broadcast programming than previous generations did. But when we expand the definition of television to reflect how audiences actually consume video today, the picture changes significantly.
Television is no longer just a linear broadcast. It also includes broadcaster video-on-demand services, catch-up platforms, and clips distributed through digital environments. When these viewing behaviours are considered together – what many in the industry now refer to as “Total TV” – the perceived gap in younger audiences shrinks dramatically.
The data shows that young viewers have not stopped watching television content. Rather, they have simply diversified the ways in which they access it. The same programmes, formats, and stories are now just consumed across multiple screens, platforms, and moments throughout the day.
For broadcasters and advertisers alike, the implication is clear: compelling content still reaches every demographic. The difference today is that the path to those audiences increasingly runs through a broader and more interconnected ecosystem of devices and platforms.
Myth 2: Infinite scroll means infinite reach
Digital platforms have transformed how video is discovered, shared, and consumed. Streaming services, online video environments, and social feeds offer extraordinary scale and have become indispensable components of modern media strategies.
But scale should not be confused with reach.
When campaigns are measured across platforms and exposures are deduplicated, we frequently see significant overlap between digital environments. In other words, many impressions reach the same audiences repeatedly across different platforms. Without independent cross-media measurement, this repetition can easily be mistaken for expanding reach.
This does not mean digital platforms are ineffective – far from it. In reality, it reflects the way people consume media today.
Audiences move fluidly between screens and formats throughout the day. A viewer might watch a television programme in the evening, encounter short-form video in a social feed during a commute, and later stream longer content on a connected device. Each environment plays a different role in how video is discovered, consumed, and remembered.
For advertisers, the opportunity is therefore not about choosing one platform over another. The real opportunity lies in understanding how these environments complement one another. Digital platforms are often critical for delivering incremental reach beyond television, particularly among lighter TV viewers and younger audiences
The most effective campaigns today combine platforms in ways that expand reach rather than simply increase frequency. Social environments can introduce content and spark discovery. Streaming and broadcaster platforms often provide deeper engagement. Linear television continues to deliver scale and moments of shared viewing that are difficult to replicate elsewhere. The key is understanding where audiences actually are – and how these different platforms work together to reach them.
Myth 3: TV is the expensive option
Another widely held belief is that television is simply the most expensive way to reach audiences.
But evaluating media purely through the lens of cost can be misleading. Different video environments serve different purposes within a campaign. Some formats are designed to maximise rapid exposure and discovery, while others create more focused viewing environments that encourage longer attention. Both types of environments play valuable roles within a modern media mix.
The real question for advertisers is therefore not only what an impression costs, but what that impression actually delivers.
When engagement and attention are taken into account – for example, whether viewers watch a large share of a video – the economics of different environments often look very different. Sit-back viewing environments, where audiences choose to watch content in a more focused context, often generate higher levels of attention.
When those factors are considered alongside cost and reach, the efficiency conversation becomes far more interesting. Ultimately, the goal is not to declare one platform inherently better than another. The real value lies in understanding how different environments contribute to a campaign’s overall effectiveness.
Facts over narratives
Advertising today is fundamentally omnichannel, and this complexity will only increase in the years ahead.
But as the ecosystem becomes more fragmented and sophisticated, the industry cannot rely on assumptions or simplified narratives. Decisions about billions of advertising dollars must be grounded in evidence rather than perception.
This is precisely where cross-media measurement becomes essential. It allows advertisers, agencies, and media owners to understand who was actually reached, how audiences overlap across environments, and where genuine incremental reach appears.
In other words, it helps the industry separate myth from reality, because in an increasingly complex media landscape, reach alone is not the most valuable currency. It is understanding the facts about reach.
This article is 6 of 6 in our series: The Great Reach Reset
About this article series
In a fragmented media landscape, reach is no longer a simple KPI - it is a strategic growth lever. In this article series, AudienceProject explores why advertisers are not failing at reach, but at measuring it properly, and why incremental, deduplicated cross-media reach has become essential to driving penetration, controlling frequency, and unlocking sustainable growth.
Signup for the AudienceProject newsletter
Industry relevant articles, truth-revealing studies, exiting new product launches and random thoughts from brilliant people - directly in your inbox. Free of charge and no spam guaranteed!