Are all impressions created equal?
Article 5 of 10 in series: The Great Reach Reset
A few weeks ago, one of our Customer Success Managers, Stephanie Hodgson, and I were discussing a customer’s cross-media campaign results in preparation for a meeting when she paused and pointed out something interesting: Are we still treating all impressions as if they have the same value?
It’s a simple question. But it’s also an uncomfortable one. Because in most media plans, an impression is still treated as a universal unit. Whether it’s delivered in a fast-scrolling social feed on a phone or on a 65-inch TV screen in a living room, it often gets counted the same way.
One impression. One exposure. But the consumer experience isn’t the same. And deep down, we all know it.
Same ad. Different reality.
Imagine watching a video clip on your phone while you’re waiting for a train. Notifications pop up, people move around you, the sound is low, and your attention is divided. You’re watching, but you’re also multitasking, scanning your surroundings, and thinking about what comes next.
Now imagine watching a series on TV in the evening. The lights are dimmed, you’re leaning back on the couch, the sound is on, and you might even be watching with someone else. The experience is more intentional and more immersive. You’re not just passing time, but actually settling in.
Both situations generate impressions, but they do not generate the same level of attention, emotion, or memory. And if advertising effectiveness is built on reach, attention, and emotion, the viewing environment plays a far bigger role than we often admit.
This is where Connected TV (CTV) becomes strategically important. When advertising appears on a big screen, the context fundamentally changes. The ad fills the screen, the sound is typically on, and the viewer is more immersed in the content. Completion rates tend to be higher, and the cognitive load is different because the viewer is in a lean-back mode rather than a distracted mobile one.
It is not simply a difference in device. It is a difference in behaviour, and behaviour is what ultimately drives impact.
Not just “another video channel”
What makes CTV powerful is that it combines the emotional power of TV with the flexibility of digital distribution. And the formats are evolving fast; Pause ads. Homepage takeovers. Premium pre-roll in streaming content, etc.
Each format drives attention. A pause ad appears when the viewer has actively stopped the content. A homepage takeover dominates the entry point in a platform. These are not small details. They shape how the brand is experienced.
And that matters, because brands are not just buying reach anymore. They are buying attention in environments where consumers increasingly control what they watch and when they watch it.
In that world, the “quality” of an impression is not a soft concept. It’s directly tied to whether the exposure is noticed, processed, and remembered.
Incrementality still comes first
Here’s the part that too many advertisers still underestimate: none of this matters if CTV doesn’t add incremental reach.
If your CTV investment reaches the same households you already reached through linear TV or other video platforms, you are just increasing frequency – not expanding your coverage.
Frequency can be valuable. But frequency without incremental reach quickly becomes an expensive illusion of progress.
This is why cross-media measurement is a strategic lever. Not because reach is everything, but because reach is the foundation. If you don’t know whether you are expanding your coverage, you don’t really know whether your video strategy is building future demand.
Incrementality and quality go hand in hand
Reach is still one of the strongest drivers of growth. Without audience, nothing happens. But not all reach is equal. Not all impressions carry the same weight.
In a fragmented media landscape, the real challenge isn’t just delivering more impressions. It’s understanding:
- Are we reaching new people?
- In which environment?
- And what is the impact?
Because if we treat all impressions as if they have the same value, we risk optimising for volume instead of value. And when budgets are significant – as video budgets usually are – that simplification becomes expensive. It’s about time we start valuing the big screen – and incremental reach – a little more consciously.
This article is 5 of 10 in our series: The Great Reach Reset
About this article series
In a fragmented media landscape, reach is no longer a simple KPI - it is a strategic growth lever. In this article series, AudienceProject explores why advertisers are not failing at reach, but at measuring it properly, and why incremental, deduplicated cross-media reach has become essential to driving penetration, controlling frequency, and unlocking sustainable growth.
You might also like:
Video killed the radio star – or did it really?
From channels to journeys: Why cross-media measurement matters more than ever
I want desirability…
I’m not a creative. But I respect the multiplier.
Myths and facts about video audiences
The new TV experience
Signup for the AudienceProject newsletter
Industry relevant articles, truth-revealing studies, exiting new product launches and random thoughts from brilliant people - directly in your inbox. Free of charge and no spam guaranteed!